Peace For Peace Is A Wrong Term That Should Be Replaced By Peace For Land Only. Poem by MOHAMMAD SKATI

Peace For Peace Is A Wrong Term That Should Be Replaced By Peace For Land Only.

Rating: 5.0


If enemies occupy
A certain country's territories
By force,
It means there is something that
Must be solved wisely anytime,
A certain country can not abandon
Its territories anyhow
Either by choosing a war or
By a fair deal whatsoever,
Peace for peace can not solve
A big crisis or a dispute
About an occupied land whatsoever,
Not a single country accepts
To abandon its occupied territories
For the sake of any fragile and useless peace,
At least if there is a good deal
Is better than not to have a good deal,
There must be a brave peace that is called
Only peace for land,
There must be a strong peace that equalizes
Both parties at least,
It is wrong to accept
Peace for peace
While your dear territories are still
Occupied by enemies.

Peace For Peace Is A Wrong Term That Should Be Replaced By Peace For Land Only.
Tuesday, September 29, 2020
Topic(s) of this poem: peace
COMMENTS OF THE POEM
Deluke Muwanigwa 29 September 2020

For God's sake i hope India and China can demonstrate love and maturity. This being an emotive issue let me shut up. But please.

0 0 Reply
Kumarmani Mahakul 29 September 2020

This is so sad if a land is occupied or territory is occupied by force by any other party. People of every land need their freedom back where they can live peacefully! Enemies should go away from such activities. They should leave the forcibly occupied land. So that peace can come back. An amazing thought provoking poem is wisely penned! ...5 stars!

0 0 Reply
READ THIS POEM IN OTHER LANGUAGES
Close
Error Success